Revised master Plan · Land Use Maps · Zoning Regulations (Z.R) · Amendment to Zoning Regulation Dated · Building Bye-Laws Karnataka Municipal Act and Rules, · Karnataka Municipal Act and Rules, · Urban Development Secretariat (Property Tax Rules ). Procedure for Building Plan Approval · Procedure for Site Inspection · Plan Sanction Details · Commencement Certificate Details · Occupancy Certificate Details.
|Published (Last):||26 November 2008|
|PDF File Size:||17.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Further all such planning exercises for Bengaluru must be under the aegis of the Municipal Planning Committee.
Notices issued to building byelaws violators in Bangalore
It is, therefore, not only the bbjp of stopping the las but also making the owners at default accountable for the injuries caused to others.
Oral enquiries of the petitioner with the 3rd respondent was responded to stating that it was for the 2nd respondent to consider the complaint. Either they don’t act kaws do not act promptly or do connive at such activities apparently for illegitimate considerations. If according to the learned Counsel for the BBMP, there is deviation in the set back area and that deviation of all the ground and second floor amounts to In other words, it was the Officers who held the position prior to his taking charge had taken action over the unauthorised construction.
Learned Counsel for BBMP files a report dated enclosing two sketches said to indicate the deviations in the construction of the building by the contesting respondent.
Please rate before posting your Review 1 Trash 1. Having regard to the large number of illegal lawd unauthorised construction in Cuttak as observed in Friends Colony Development Committee v. Judicial discretion wherever it is required to be exercised has to be in accordance with law and set legal principles.
Building Plan – BBMP
Therefore, action is also necessary to check corruption, nepotism and total apathy towards the rights of the citizens. Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community.
It must be observed that respondent-Corporation suppressed material information in the statement of objections, since there is no reference to many relevant and material points for consideration in the matter of sanction of building plan as also, Annexure-M, endorsement. Zoning and planning bbnp result in hardship to individual property owners as their freedom to use their property in the way they like, is subjected to regulation and control.
In such cases, when the ratepayers approach the Court byw about the misuse or abuse of powers by public authorities, the Court cannot drive them away on technical grounds.
If such activities are to stop, some stringent actions are required to be taken by ruthlessly demolishing the illegal constructions and non-compoundable deviations. Unfortunately, despite repeated judgments by this Court and the High Courts, the builders and other affluent people engaged in the construction activities, who have, over the years shown scant respect for regulatory mechanism envisaged in the municipal and other similar laws, as also the master plans, zonal development plans, sanctioned plans, etc.
It is the allegation of the petitioner that 4th respondent without obtaining a sanction of a building plan has put up construction of six floors lawz five floors according to learned Counsel for the petitionerconsisting of stilt, ground, first, second and third floors.
State of Orissaextracted the relevant portion of the opinion which reads thus: It is therefore necessary not only to stop misuse but also make the owner, at default, accountable for the injuries caused to others. Union Of India And Others.
It is said in the aforesaid circumstances, Annexure-M endorsement came to be issued, therefore a lenient view be taken in the matter in the interest of justice and equity. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the Town Planning Scheme, etc.
Union of Indiaobserved thus: Dipak Kumar Mukherjee vs.
State Of Assam And Others. Issue a writ of mandamus, similar writ, order or direction and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to demolish the construction put up illegally over the Schedule Property; d. B Narasimha Murthy subscribed to Annexures-R3, R4 and R5 and failed to prevent the construction of the building with deviations by the 4th respondent.
Hence 4th bnmp is disentitled to seek regularisation of such deviations. Radhey Shyam Sahuobserved thus:. Supreme Court Of India08 Oct We do hope you will take on record our objections and urge in the strongest possible terms that the present draft notification be not acted on. Report to be filed on which: Although the report submitted by the BBMP is said to be in compliance with the order datedlaw it is not a compliance. Our work is to empower citizens, made possible by your donation.
The Authority may further require the corner of the building to be rounded off or cut-off parallel to the rounded off or gye boundary upto the height of the ground floor. Nov 2, ,