These journalists published the back seat conversations in a book with the name “The Endstra-Tapes” omitting only fillers such as “um” and. Commentaar op de Endstra-Tapes zaak over de vraag of op de ‘ achterbankgesprekken’ auteursrecht rust. De auteur meent van wel en bekritiseert de uitspraak. These journalists published these conversations in a book with the name ‘the Endstra-tapes’ only omitting too many ‘ers’, dots and certain.
|Published (Last):||18 August 2017|
|PDF File Size:||18.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.42 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Although Endstra undoubtedly thought about what he wanted and did not want to release to the detectives and therefore applied a certain selection, he did not intentionally couch his story in this design, which means that there is no copyrighted work.
Endstra’s final work: scope of protection Dutch copyright remains very wide | Bart Beuving
Concrete examples of works that may be copyrighted, are novels, paintings, software and this article, but also television formats, musical improvisations, games and lectures. Inthe Dutch Supreme Court determined that also a scent may qualify for copyright protection. The interviews can therefore not qualify for copyright protection. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Maarten Van damme rated it did not like it Jun 10, You are commenting using your WordPress.
Hierbij moet altijd Bart Beuving als auteur en de domeinnaam www.
However, it is not important whether the author has intentionally wanted to create a work and has intentionally wanted to make creative choices. It is therefore clear that a large diversity of works in The Netherlands enjoy copyright protection. In the same year it was also affirmed that kinetic schemes may also be copyrighted. Enkele van deze publicaties zijn op deze website terug te vinden.
It is therefore clear that a large diversity of works in the Netherlands enjoy copyright protection. Furthermore, in practical respect it is naturally very hard to find out whether a particular form was intentionally chosen. For this, they inter alia assert that the back seat conversations were conducted in an interview form and that these interviews are to be designated as a work in the meaning of the Copyright Act and are therefore copyrighted like a painting or lecture.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
One comment Seemingly to say that the quality of the conversation counts? He also accused the Holleeder-organisation of a large number of murders. If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries lexology.
Moreover, Holleeder and his associates already know the content of the official reports of the recordings due to the criminal proceedings, which are based on the Endstra tapes. A second demarcation line is the fine line between private copyright and the free flow of information in public domain. They argued that the conversations are interviews, and are therefore protected by copyright. Please contact customerservices lexology.
In addition, they contended that publishing the book amounts to an illegal breach of their privacy which poses a significant threat to their lives. It was tspes that the requirements applicable to qualify for copyright protection in The Netherlands are low, but not so low that there was no threshold at all. Rene added it Feb 09, Soray marked it as to-read Jan 27, This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Endstra’s final work? Dutch copyright: scope of protection remains very wide
Vinod Kadirbaks added it Dec 22, Lists with This Enddstra. Endstra told them that he was extorted for many millions by Willem Holleeder. If in the Endstra-tapes sufficiently creative choices were made, these conversations attract copyright. Login Register Follow on Twitter Search. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter ejdstra comment here Examples of works that may be the subject of copyright are novels, paintings, software and also television formats, musical improvisations, games and lectures.
Endstra thought he was only transferring information hoping that on this basis the Criminal Intelligence Unit would catch Holleeder and his colleagues. Want to Read saving…. Regina rated it liked it Jul 22, Endetra Verstraeten rated it liked it Mar 15, Duidelijk een oppertunistisch boekje voor het moment, heel even een geldmakertjie.
After the Amsterdam Court of Appeal had ruled that the backseat conversations could not be protected by copyright, the Dutch Supreme Court concluded that copyright protection was not impossible by definition. These courts see the conversations as a businesslike transfer of information.
Tot 31 december schreef Bart Beuving wel eens over auteursrecht, e-business, databankenrecht en open source software. Preview — De Endstra-tapes by Bart Middelburg. The recordings of the conversations were handed over to the Nationale Recherche National Investigation Bureau.
How to procure innovation? Whether the work is beautiful or ugly, good or bad, requires little effort or years of work, is irrelevant in establishing whether or not the work attracts copyright protection.
Less than four months after the last conversation, Endstra was murdered. It made an official report of the recordings in January